Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
1.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 261(5): 1381-1389, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323659

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) in the patients treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI). METHOD: Twenty-one eyes of 11 AIR patients treated with at least 1 injection of IDI were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes before and after treatment, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optic coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), full-field electroretinography (ff-ERG), and visual field (VF) at last visit within 6 and/or 12 months, were recorded. RESULTS: Among all the patients, 3 had cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) and 8 had non-paraneoplastic-AIR (npAIR) with mean followed up of 8.52 ± 3.03 months (range 4-12 months). All patients achieved improved or stable BCVA within 6 and/or 12 months after the treatment. Cystoid macular edema (CME) in 2 eyes and significant retinal inflammation in 4 eyes were markedly resolved after single injection. Central retinal thickness (CFT) in all eyes without CME, ellipsoid zone (EZ) on OCT in 71.4% of eyes, ERG response in 55% of eyes, and VF in 50% of eyes were stable or improved within 6 months after treatment. At last visit within 12 months, both BCVA and CFT remained stable in the eyes treated with either single or repeated IDI; however, progression of EZ loss and damage of ERG response occurred in some patients with single IDI. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes, including BCVA and parameters of OCT, ERG, and VF, were stable or improved after IDI in a majority of AIR patients. Local treatment of AIR with IDI was a good option to initiate the management or an alternative for the patients' refractory to the systemic therapy but with limited side effect.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Retinal Diseases , Humans , Dexamethasone , Glucocorticoids , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Retinal Diseases/complications , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Retina , Intravitreal Injections , Drug Implants/therapeutic use , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications
2.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.05.03.23289435

ABSTRACT

BackgroundPrimary care practices play a critical role in ensuring that patients with diabetes undergo an annual eye examination, the importance of which is underscored by the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures. Store-and-forward teleophthalmology, where ocular images are read remotely by an ophthalmologist, has the potential to facilitate this role. MethodsIn this report, we aim to measure if using a primary care-based teleophthalmology program improves access to eye examinations for diabetic patients as reflected in HEDIS measures. Over a 20-month period, non-mydriatic fundus photographs were obtained at five primary care sites in the San Francisco Bay Area from patients with a new or existing diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 who needed an annual eye examination. Collected photographs were evaluated remotely by vitreoretinal specialists for diabetic retinopathy. Our primary measures were the proportion and number of annual eye exams of diabetic patients in primary care clinics that participated in the teleophthalmology program compared to clinics that did not participate. Additional measures included the number of patients with DR who were identified through the program, gradeability of fundus photographs, and characteristics of the study population. ResultsThe program screened 760 unique patients, 84 of whom were found to have DR (11.1%). The rate of ungradable photos was 9.7%, which was greater for patients who self-reported as racially non-White. For the duration of the study, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, both the proportion and number of diabetic patients receiving annual eye examination increased (17.1% increase in proportion, 14.8% increase in number). In comparison, primary care sites that did not offer the teleophthalmology service declined in these measures (2.3% decrease in proportion, 17.0% decrease in number). ConclusionsPrimary care-based teleophthalmology improves access to eye exam for diabetic patients and identifies patients with diabetic retinopathy across diverse communities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Duane Retraction Syndrome , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy
3.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 42: 103513, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2263189

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is evidence of decreased vessel density in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) after Covid-19. We aimed to investigate whether the outcome of retinal vasculopathy would be worse if patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were infected with coronavirus using OCTA to assess retinal vessels. METHODS: One eye of each subject was included in the study. Diabetic patients without retinopathy and non-diabetic controls were divided into four groups according to their Covid-19 history: group 1=DM(-)Covid-19(-); group 2=DM(+)Covid-19(-); group 3=DM(-)Covid-19(+); and group 4=DM(+)Covid-19(+). All Covid-19 patients were not hospitalised. Macular OCTA scans were performed in a 6 × 6 mm area. RESULTS: Diabetes had no effect on the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), but Covid-19 caused an increase in FAZ area. Diabetes and Covid-19 had an effect on both the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) in the fovea. Eta squared (ƞ2) is a measure of effect size. The effect size of Covid-19 (ƞ2=0.180) was found to be greater than that of diabetes (ƞ2=0.158) on the SCP, whereas the effect size of diabetes (ƞ2=0.159) was found to be greater than that of Covid-19 (ƞ2=0.091) on the DCP. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of vessel density was lower in the fovea and the FAZ area was enlarged in the diabetic patients who recovered from Covid-19. In diabetic patients Covid-19 may lead to deterioration of vascular metrics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Photochemotherapy , Humans , Fluorescein Angiography/methods , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Fundus Oculi , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents , Retinal Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Fovea Centralis/blood supply , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
4.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 98(4): 213-219, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251829

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Digital evolution represents an opportunity for ophthalmology to adapt to new care models. This study aimed to find out how the pandemic has modified the clinical practice and training activities of the ophthalmologist specialised in ocular surface, as well as to analyse emerging trends and needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out through an online survey. A committee of 3 specialists developed a questionnaire of 25 questions structured in: 1) Participant profile; 2) Impact of the pandemic on patient management and professional activities; 3) Trends and needs. RESULTS: 68 clinical ophthalmologists participated. There was a high degree of agreement (90%) that the pandemic has delayed ophthalmological follow-up visits and diagnosis. The participants agreed that the frequency of patients with dry eye disease (75%), stye/chalazion (62%) and blepharitis (60%) has increased. According to 28%, remote monitoring of pathologies such as dry eye, glaucoma, diabetes, conjunctivitis, hyposphagmas, styes, etc., will be common, especially in the young population. This will be especially relevant in chronic or mild pathologies of the ocular surface, and in the follow-up of patients after cataract and diabetic retinopathy interventions. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, an increase in the incidence of certain ocular surface diseases has been perceived. The telematic follow-up of chronic or mild pathologies of the ocular surface entails the need to provide specific training for both the patient and the healthcare professional, in addition to screening and referral protocols that would optimise the flow of care.


Subject(s)
Blepharitis , COVID-19 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Glaucoma , Ophthalmology , Humans , Ophthalmology/methods , Glaucoma/diagnosis
5.
ssrn; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.4415694

ABSTRACT

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence emerged to suggest that people with diabetic retinopathy (DR) or other microvascular diseases were at greater risk of severe short-term outcomes. Evaluation of outcomes over the longer term and more generalisable evidence were needed. Methods: We identified a cohort of UKBiobank participants with diabetes and retrieved their diagnostic codes for a variety of microvascular diseases, other diabetic complications and systemic comorbidities from hospital admissions data. We investigated the relationship between these diagnoses and the study outcome: admission to Critical Care or death from COVID-19, taking age, sex and diabetes duration into account. We tested the relationships further by adding more baseline covariates, and weighting diagnostic codes according to their recency prior to testing positive for COVID-19.Findings: In univariate analyses, DR (OR: 1·519, p= 0·016) and microvascular disease (OR: 2·001, p=0·000) were both associated with greater risk of the study outcome. In multivariate analyses, as may be expected, respiratory disease was the comorbidity most strongly associated with the study outcome, with microvascular disease second. Adjusting the analyses by number of hospital admissions (a proxy for general health) and weighted diagnostic coding (an indicator of comorbidity recency or severity at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis), did not improve the predictive power of the model.Interpretation: The presence of microvascular disease in routinely-collected healthcare data predicts the risk of severe outcomes of COVID-19, independently of general health, in a diabetic cohort. Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from Diabetes UK (20/0006221). The funders did not influence the study design or methodology.Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Tract Diseases , Microvascular Angina , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , COVID-19 , Diabetic Angiopathies
6.
Comput Intell Neurosci ; 2023: 1305583, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2194246

ABSTRACT

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common retinal vascular disease, which can cause severe visual impairment. It is of great clinical significance to use fundus images for intelligent diagnosis of DR. In this paper, an intelligent DR classification model of fundus images is proposed. This method can detect all the five stages of DR, including of no DR, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative. This model is composed of two key modules. FEB, feature extraction block, is mainly used for feature extraction of fundus images, and GPB, grading prediction block, is used to classify the five stages of DR. The transformer in the FEB has more fine-grained attention that can pay more attention to retinal hemorrhage and exudate areas. The residual attention in the GPB can effectively capture different spatial regions occupied by different classes of objects. Comprehensive experiments on DDR datasets well demonstrate the superiority of our method, and compared with the benchmark method, our method has achieved competitive performance.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Fundus Oculi , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Benchmarking
7.
preprints.org; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-PREPRINTS.ORG | ID: ppzbmed-10.20944.preprints202211.0274.v1

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the COVID-19 pandemic has affected screening programmes. The aim of present study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the screening of diabetes patients in our Health Care Area (HCA); (2) Methods: A retrospective study of patients with DM who had attended the DR screening programme between January 2015 and June 2022. We studied attendance, DM metabolic control and DR incidence. (3) Results: Screening for DR decreased in the first months of the pandemic. Incidence of mild and moderate DR remained stable throughout the study, and we observed a little increase in severe-DR, proliferative-DR and neovascular glaucoma, during 2021 and 2022. (4) Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a reduction in the number of patients screened for DM, although its effect on DR seems limited, with a similar number of patients with DR throughout 2015 to 2022, despite the number of patients with severe-DR and proliferative-DR increased in 2021 and 2022.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Neovascular , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy
8.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-2243420.v1

ABSTRACT

Recently, there have been reports of new cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Podocytic damage, IgA nephropathy, vasculitis, tubulointerstitial damage, and thrombotic microangiopathy have been reported as the causes. However, there are no reports of acute tubular injury (ATI) as the sole cause of AKI. In this case, a 54-year-old man with type 2 diabetes visited a local physician. He was highly obese with a body mass index of 36 kg/m2. He was treated with metformin and insulin. Diabetic retinopathy, urinary protein, and occult blood were absent. He had received four COVID-19 vaccines; three were from Pfizer and one from Moderna. He was referred to our hospital 5 days after receiving the fourth dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. He had stage 3 AKI. Urinary findings revealed the presence of new proteinuria and glomerular occult blood. Steroids were introduced on the day of admission for rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. A renal biopsy was performed on the second day, with results obtained on the fifth day revealing no findings other than ATI. The patient was therefore deemed unamenable to steroids. After steroid discontinuation, renal function recovered spontaneously, and urinalysis abnormalities disappeared. In this case, ATI was the sole pathogenesis of COVID-19 vaccine-induced AKI, and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs was not necessary.


Subject(s)
Acute Disease , Proteinuria , Vasculitis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Thrombotic Microangiopathies , Kidney Diseases , Obesity , Glomerulonephritis , Acute Kidney Injury , Nephritis, Interstitial , COVID-19 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Cardiovascular Abnormalities
9.
Acta Diabetol ; 59(12): 1521-1530, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1990649

ABSTRACT

AIM: The purpose of this review is to examine the applications of novel digital technology domains for the screening and management of patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A PubMed engine search was performed, using the terms "Telemedicine", "Digital health", "Telehealth", "Telescreening", "Artificial intelligence", "Deep learning", "Smartphone", "Triage", "Screening", "Home-based", "Monitoring", "Ophthalmology", "Diabetes", "Diabetic Retinopathy", "Retinal imaging". Full-text English language studies from January 1, 2010, to February 1, 2022, and reference lists were considered for the conceptual framework of this review. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus and its eye complications, including DR, are particularly well suited to digital technologies, providing an ideal model for telehealth initiatives and real-world applications. The current development in the adoption of telemedicine, artificial intelligence and remote monitoring as an alternative to or in addition to traditional forms of care will be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in digital health have created an ecosystem ripe for telemedicine in the field of DR to thrive. Stakeholders and policymakers should adopt a participatory approach to ensure sustained implementation of these technologies after the COVID-19 pandemic. This article belongs to the Topical Collection "Diabetic Eye Disease", managed by Giuseppe Querques.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Telemedicine , Humans , Pandemics , Ecosystem , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Mass Screening
10.
Surv Ophthalmol ; 67(6): 1593-1602, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984091

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the regular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in patients with various retinal diseases globally. It is unclear to what extent delayed anti-VEGF injections have worsened patients' visual acuity. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of delayed anti-VEGF injections on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). We searched four computer databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus) from inception to January 5, 2022. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Results were reported by less than 4 months and 4 months or longer for the time period between the first injection during the pandemic and the last pre-pandemic injection. All BCVA measures were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for analyses. Among patients who received injections 4 months or longer apart, the mean difference in BCVA was 0.10 logMAR (or 5 ETDRS letters) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06∼0.14) for nAMD patients, 0.01 logMAR (or∼ 1 ETDRS letter) (95% CI -0.25∼0.27) for RVO patients, and 0.03 logMAR (or ∼1 ETDRS letters) (95% CI -0.06∼0.11) for DME patients. These results suggest that patients with nAMD needing scheduled anti-VEGF injections may require priority treatment over those with RVO and DME in the event of disturbed anti-VEGF injections from COVID-19 lockdowns or similar scenarios.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Retinal Diseases , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Communicable Disease Control , Endothelial Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Pandemics , Ranibizumab/therapeutic use , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Visual Acuity
11.
J Diabetes Res ; 2022: 6620661, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1962494

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of garlic (Allium sativum L.) tablets as a complimentary herbal medication in diabetic macular edema. Methods: A total of 91 diabetic participants (117 eyes) with central involved macular edema underwent a double-blind randomized trial. The patients used garlic tablets (500 mg) (2 tab/day) or placebo for 4 weeks and subsequently were examined by an expert ophthalmologist. Clinical manifestations including the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured as the main outcomes. Results: BCVA was significantly improved by a 0.18 decrease in mean logMAR value in the garlic-treated patients in comparison with 0.06 in the control ones (P value = 0.027). CMT was decreased in both groups by a 102.99 µm decrease in the garlic group compared to 52.67 µm in the placebo group, albeit in a nonsignificant manner (P value: 0.094). IOP was decreased in the garlic group by 1.03 mmHg (P value: 0.024) and increased by 0.3 mmHg (P value: 0.468) in the placebo group. Conclusion: Our trial suggests that garlic supplements can improve visual acuity, decrease the CMT and lower the IOP, and can be considered as an adjuvant treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema. Garlic was satisfactorily tolerated in diabetic patients, and no significant adverse effect interrupting the safety profile was observed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Garlic , Macular Edema , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Tablets/therapeutic use , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
12.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 85(7): 793-798, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1927457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although teleophthalmology has gained traction in recent years, it is at the center of the coronavirus disease pandemic. However, most hospitals are not ready owing to a severe lack of real-world experience. Furthermore, a limited number of studies have evaluated telemedicine applications on remote islands. This study aimed to evaluate real-world clinical and referral accuracy, image quality, physician-perceived diagnostic certainty, and patient satisfaction with telemedicine eye screening using a novel handheld fundus camera in a rural and medically underserved population. METHODS: This prospective study included 176 eyes from a remote island. All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Nonmydriatic retinal images obtained using a handheld fundus camera were reviewed by two retinal specialists to determine image quality, diagnosis, and need for referrals. The agreement of diagnosis between image-based assessments was compared with that of binocular indirect ophthalmoscopic assessments. RESULTS: Image quality of fundus photographs was considered acceptable or ideal in 97.7% and 95.5% of eyes assessed by two reviewers, respectively. There was considerable agreement in diagnosis between the indirect ophthalmoscopic assessment and image-based assessment by two reviewers (Cohen's kappa = 0.80 and 0.78, respectively). Likewise, substantial agreement was achieved in the referrals. The sensitivity for referable retinopathy from the two reviewers was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-91%) and 78% (95% CI, 57%-91%), whereas specificity was 99% (95% CI, 95%-99%] and 98% (95% CI, 93%-99%), respectively. For physicians' perceived certainty of diagnosis, 93.8% and 90.3% were considered either certain or reliable. Overall, 97.4% of participants were satisfied with their experiences and greatly valued the telemedicine services. CONCLUSION: Novel fundus camera-based telemedicine screening demonstrated high accuracy in detecting clinically significant retinopathy in real-world settings. It achieved high patient satisfaction and physician-perceived certainty in diagnosis with reliable image quality, which may be scaled internationally to overcome geographical barriers under the global pandemic.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy , Ophthalmology , Physicians , Retinal Diseases , Telemedicine , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Prospective Studies , Telemedicine/methods
13.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(9)2022 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1820251

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the implementation of diabetes complications screening in South Korea during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Data from the Korea Community Health Surveys conducted in 2019 and 2020 were used. This study included 51,471 participants. Multiple level analysis was used to investigate the relationships between screening for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy and variables of both individual- and community-level factors in 2019 and 2020, before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Diabetes nephropathy complications screening in 2020 had a lower odds ratio. However, regions heavily affected by COVID-19 showed a negative association with diabetes complications screening after the COVID-19 outbreak. For those being treated with medication for diabetes, there was a significant negative association with diabetic nephropathy screening after the outbreak. The COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a reduction in the use of diabetes nephropathy complications screening. Additionally, only regions heavily affected by COVID-19 spread showed a negative association with diabetes complications screening compared to before the COVID-19 outbreak. In this regard, it appears that many patients were unable to attend outpatient care due to COVID-19. As such, these patients should be encouraged to visit clinics for diabetes complications screening. Furthermore, alternative methods need to be developed to support these patients. Through these efforts, the development of diabetes-related complications should be prevented, and the costs associated with these complications will be reduced.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Nephropathies , Diabetic Retinopathy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/complications , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetic Nephropathies/diagnosis , Diabetic Nephropathies/epidemiology , Diabetic Nephropathies/etiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
14.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 36(4): e24334, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1782612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Among patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR), no proof was available to confirm the prognostic significance of the neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR). We hypothesized that NPAR plays a role in the incidence of DR in diabetic patients. METHODS: We extracted all diabetes mellitus (DM) data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database between 1999 and 2018, NPAR was expressed as neutrophil percentage/albumin. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized additive model were utilized for the purpose of examining the correction between NPAR levels and DR. Subgroup analysis of the associations between NPAR and DR was carried out to investigate if the impact of the NPAR varied among different subgroups. RESULTS: An aggregate of 5850 eligible participants were included in the present research. The relationship between NPAR levels and DR was positive linear. In the multivariate analysis, following the adjustment for confounders (gender, white blood cell, age, monocyte percent, red cell distribution width, eosinophils percent, bicarbonate, body mass index, iron, glucose, basophils percent, total bilirubin, creatinine, and chloride), higher NPAR was an independent risk factor for DR compared to lower NPAR (OR, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.00-1.39; 1.24, 1.04-1.48). For the purpose of sensitivity analysis, we found a trend of consistency (p for trend: 0.0190). The results of the subgroup analysis revealed that NPAR did not exert any statistically significant interactions with any of the other DR risk variables. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated NPAR is associated with an elevated risk of occurrence of DR in diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Albumins/analysis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Neutrophils/chemistry , Nutrition Surveys , Risk Factors
15.
Front Public Health ; 10: 808988, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776006

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of diabetic subjects with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and those without DR (NDR) in an urban community in Northeast China, as well as their risk factors in subjects with DR and NDR. Methods: A community-based survey involving 1,662 subjects was conducted in Fushun, China, between July 2012 and May 2013. The subjects included diabetics with DR (n = 783) and those NDR (n = 879), and questionnaires were completed to collect information about their sociodemographic and healthcare characteristics. A Chi-square test and multiple logistic analyses were performed to analyze the data. Results: Among the DR group, 21.88% had a good knowledge of DR, 94.15% had a positive attitude, and 68.07% followed good practice, whereas 20.98% of the NDR group had a good knowledge of DR, 94.18% had a positive attitude, and 66.92% followed good practice. There was no significant difference in the KAP of the two groups of subjects. In the NDR group, a good level of knowledge was associated with a high-level of education (OR = 0.1, 0.2; p < 0.05), a good attitude was associated with retirement (OR = 0.2; p < 0.05), and good practice was associated with being female, having a high-level of education, and the type of treatment (OR = 0.5, 0.4, 2.3, 3.1; p < 0.05). In the DR group, good practice was associated with older age and retirement (OR = 0.6, 0.4; p < 0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the DR and NDR subjects in the overall levels of KAP, but both groups showed a poor level of knowledge. Age, gender, education, occupation, and type of treatment were the main factors associated with the KAP scores, more risk factors in the NDR group than in the DR group. There is an urgent need for coordinated educational campaigns with a prioritized focus on the northeast region of China, especially NDR group.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , China , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Urban Population
16.
psyarxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-PSYARXIV | ID: ppzbmed-10.31234.osf.io.stm3k

ABSTRACT

AimDiabetic eye screening is important for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy, to prevent sight loss. The COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted in additional factors influencing whether individuals with diabetes choose to attend their appointment. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to attending diabetic eye screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodEleven semi-structured interviews were conducted between 7th April 2021 and 9th July 2021. Participants included those with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were in a retinopathy priority group. Interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams either as video or telephone interviews. Central questions included topics such as thoughts and feelings on COVID-19 and how participants felt about diabetic eye screening. Data were analysed via reflexive thematic analysis. ResultsTwo themes were developed: “Keeping safe from COVID-19 at appointments” and “The importance of protecting their eyesight”. Participants explained barriers and facilitators to keeping safe from COVID-19 at their appointment. These included increased confidence from the vaccine, the perceived risk of catching COVID-19 in certain environments, and trusting the NHS to keep them safe. Participants also discussed the importance of their eyesight and their identity as an attender, which facilitated attendance. Overall, participants considered the benefits of attending screening against the perceived risk of catching COVID-19.ConclusionsThe results indicated several barriers and facilitators participants experienced when deciding whether to attend an eye screening appointment since the COVID-19 pandemic. Service communications must address these as the pandemic continues, and for other future outbreaks of infectious disease.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Communicable Diseases , Diabetic Retinopathy , COVID-19
17.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 187: 109869, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1773244

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Certain patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) have high risk for complications from COVID-19. We aimed to test the hypothesis that pre-existing diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microvascular disease, is a prognostic indicator for poor COVID-19 outcome in this heterogeneous population. METHODS: Seven databases (including MEDLINE) and grey literature were searched, identifying eligible studies using predetermined selection criteria. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used for quality assessment, followed by narrative synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: Eight cohort studies were identified. Three showed significant positive associations between DR and poor COVID-19 outcomes. The highest quality study, McGurnaghan, found increased risk of the combined outcome fatal or critical care unit (CCU)-treated COVID-19 with referable-grade DR (OR 1.672, 95% CI 1.38-2.03). Indirectly, four studies reported positive associations with microvascular disease and poorer prognosis. Variability between studies limited comparability. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature suggests an independent association between DR and poorer COVID-19 prognosis in patients with DM after controlling for key variables such as age. The use of standardised methodology in future studies would establish the predictive value of DR with greater confidence. Researchers should consider comparing the predictive value of DR and its severity, to other microvascular complications of DM.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Prognosis
18.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 236: 241-248, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1757062

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of nonmydriatic ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus photographs taken in a hematology clinic setting for screening of sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: This single-site study took place at the Johns Hopkins Sickle Cell Center for Adults and the Wilmer Eye Institute. The study population was 90 eyes of 46 consecutive adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). Bilateral nonmydriatic fundus photos taken by clinic personnel during the participants' routine hematology appointment were graded by 2 masked retina specialists at the Wilmer Eye Institute for the presence of nonproliferative SCR (NPSR) and proliferative sickle retinopathy (PSR). A third retina specialist adjudicated in cases of grader disagreement. All participants underwent the standard dilated fundus examination (DFE) within 2 years of acquisition of UWF photographs. The main outcome measure was the sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic UWF images for the detection of NPSR and PSR RESULTS: PSR was noted in 19 of 90 eyes that underwent DFE and in 9 of 67 gradable UWF images. Interrater agreement between the 2 graders was moderate, with κ = 0.65 (range 0.43-0.87) for PSR. For gradable UWF photos, the sensitivity and specificity of detecting SCR using the nonmydriatic photos compared with the DFE were 85.2% and 62.5% for NPSR, respectively, and 69.2% and 100% for detection of PSR, respectively. One participant required ophthalmic therapy in both eyes for active sea-fan neovascularization. CONCLUSIONS: UWF imaging shows utility in screening for SCR and may help identify patients with PSR who require a DFE and who may benefit from treatment.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Diabetic Retinopathy , Hematology , Retinal Diseases , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Fundus Oculi , Humans , Photography/methods , Prospective Studies , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Retinal Diseases/etiology
19.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 22(1): 119, 2022 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1736355

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Routine hospital eye services (HES) across the National health service (NHS), and diabetic eye screening (DES) in Scotland were paused during the COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020. Alternate pathways for managing acute ophthalmic pathology were devised in NHS Grampian covering the North-East of Scotland. Emergency eye treatment centres (EETC) manned by community optometrists were set up to treat and triage referrals to HES. METHODS: Retrospective study analysing consecutive patients referred to a tertiary eye centre (Aberdeen Royal Infirmary) with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) related complications between March and August 2020. General demographical data, diabetic history, visual acuity, ocular complication, type of management, time to follow-up, and any appointment cancellations were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty two eyes of 46 patients with PDR related complications were identified. HES appointment had been delayed or cancelled in 22 patients (48%) due to COVID-19. Mean age was 54.5 years (±15.1), 21 (46%) were female, 21 (46%) had type 1 diabetes; mean HbA1c was 78 mmol/l (±18.7). Vision ranged from 6/6 to perception of light. 36 (78%) patients had unilateral vitreous haemorrhage (VH), 6 (13%) bilateral, 2 (4%) tractional retinal detachments and 3 (6.5%) had neovascular glaucoma. Of 48 acute PDR presentations, 18 (38%) were given anti-VEGF within 72 h and two (4%) had PRP the same day. 16 (33%) were rebooked into the laser clinic, 13 (27%) referred for urgent surgical review, and 17 (35%) advised observation and review in clinic. After a median follow-up of 6 months, 12 eyes (23%) of 11 patients progressed to have vitrectomy. CONCLUSION: Despite lockdown, hospital appointment cancellations and recommended footfall reduction limiting capacity due to COVID-19, patients reaching out with PDR complications were promptly referred to HES and appropriate treatments carried out with COVID-19 precautions as recommended.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , COVID-19/complications , Communicable Disease Control , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , State Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL